How Evangelicals Can Undermine God -in Evangelism

As a fairly new believer I attended an evangelistically zealous Arminian Southern Baptist mega-church here in Omaha. I too was zealous for evangelism and for growth. I enjoyed the culture of evangelism that the Senior Pastor had developed and fueled. However, as my theological senses began to sharpen and I began growing in the word, something strange happened, I got frustrated.

The church rolled out a new evangelism strategy that was geared toward reaching and converting more people. There was a slick acronym that the evangelist was to follow and there were key verses that we must use. Additionally, we were all told that we had to go and attend the training provided by this new evangelism program’s guru.

As I read the outline and interacted with the strategy I was shocked to uncover the seed of my discomfort: the avoidance of mentioning sin/judgment/wrath/substitution. So there I sat in visible frustration with this new program. I was even told not to do evangelism at this church unless I adopted this methodology.

With zeal accruing like the national debt I attended an all church meeting launching this new program / strategy. When the Pastor was finished with his promotion and/or presentation he opened up the floor for questions. After a few others gushed with pragmatic testimonies of success in this program I raised my hand. The pastor came over and in front of the 4,000+ in attendance I asked him at what point in the “presentation” we might tell them about sin. He deferred to the leaders of the new program, who began to get a bit loud in refutation of my seemingly silly question. There was no answer because sin was not discussed. Sure it may have been referenced as some type of moral inadequacy but never in terms of direct rebellion and disobedience to the Sovereign of heaven and earth.

As you might imagine I soon left this church. However, the ‘evangelism’ strategy has not. Nor has it left the scores of other pop-evangelical churches across America, who, fail to explain sin in there proclamation of the gospel. This ridiculous practice sounds nice when we don’t believe in biblical sin, but it is ridiculous when we speak in terms of real and fatal disease. Imagine the uproar if medical professionals began skirting the diagnosis of diseases such as cancer or AIDS in favor of making their dying patients “feel better”? It is an unsettling testimony to observe the standards for medical fidelity are higher than gospel fidelity.

As God would have it he saves sinners through the gospel. It is the gospel alone that is called “the power of God for salvation” (Rom. 1.16). The gospel as Paul says here is that body of truth that explains God’s character, man’s sinfulness, and Christ’s substitutionary atonement, man’s repentance from sin and reception of the righteousness of Christ by faith (justification). How can anyone understand their need for or even desire a Savior apart from understanding their destitute position before a just and inflexible judge? It is ridiculous and biblically stupid to hold forth a loving Jesus who is tolerant of sin, plagued with a bad memory, willing to be bribed, and so nice that he became God’s spiritual piñata and took a beating that we might get all the candy because we are so good.

To hold forth a different gospel is to hold forth a different Jesus. How about this: it is to lie! You are lying when you don’t tell people that God is angry at sin, that he is intolerant of it and that he is going to judge the thoughts and intentions of our hearts with rigid righteousness lest we repent and flee to the Lord our Righteousness for loving forgiveness.

This really is perverted. See in effort to accommodate “seekers” or the “unchurched” or the “dechurched”, (unbelievers) they undermine the only message that can truly save their souls. It is no different than the doctor telling the guy with a tumor that he just has allergies. It is gospel malpractice. It is worse than being silent, it is misleading sinners and undermining God. God saves through his gospel of his son and this gospel is not up for revision. Evangelicals who try to get cute and smart (regardless of motives, for I do not know them) undermine God.

So much like sanctification we have in evangelism the following conclusions:

If God saves sinners exclusively through the gospel (and he does) and people do not proclaim the biblical gospel (and they don’t) we must conclude:

1) Many pastors and church members do not know that the gospel is the exclusive power of God for salvation

2) Many pastors and church members do not believe that the gospel is the power of God for salvation

3) Many pastors and church members do not chiefly value people getting saved

This is discouraging but true and it calls for Christians to take up Jesus’ gospel and study it, preach it to ourselves, defend it in the church and in the world, and then faithfully share it with all.

Possibly Related posts:

1. How Evangelicals Can Undermine God -in Sanctification
2. Q&A Friday: From a Reformed perspective, why do evangelism?
3. What is the aim of evangelism?
4. The Gospel and Personal Evangelism
5. Evangelism Linebacker

10 Responses to “How Evangelicals Can Undermine God -in Evangelism”

1. thelamp says:

   November 10, 2006 at 5:30 pm

   sin exposes darkness when there should be light. Sadly, probably the reason why so many choose not to expose darkness is because they might be living in darkness and they do not wish to be placed upon a standard of measurement. God said, “Be holy for I am holy”. I’ll be the first to admit I am not holy as I ought to be. However, I do approach people and will deal with sin issues in a loving yet convicting way. I recommend http://www.wayofthemaster.com for some resources regards to evangelism. They’re not the final word, but they’re much better.

   http://thelamp.wordpress.com
   http://www.covenantdata.com/golive/
2. erik says:

   November 10, 2006 at 8:12 pm

   I do appreciate Ray Comforts ministry. His passion to expose and proclaim sin in evangelism was (and is) helpful to me.

   We will not begin to appreciate our salvation without beginning to understand our own sinfulness.
3. Pastor Steve says:

   November 10, 2006 at 11:18 pm

   Erik,
   I am busy getting ready to pack and move to the big N, but I happened to check e-mail and surf the net. What was the strategy? was it the Faith strategy, Kingdom, Connect, or do you remember?
   I hate to see what people zealous for seeing others become “christians” will do to the gospel. Unfortunately, the SBC is notorious for coming up with new strategies that are more sleek and easy to be a so called Christian.
   That is also why Mark Dever will never be elected the SBC president (he was nominated this year). If you are not a southern armenian, you will not get the support. There are a number of good people in the SBC, but I don’t believe Calvinism will ever be accepted within the mainstream. So, why would we expect a strategy that tells problem and gives the solution …. when we are solely responsible for people getting persuaded…. er, sold…. er, saved.

   In Christ,
   Steve
4. erik says:

   November 11, 2006 at 11:18 am

   Steve,

   It will be good to have you up in Nebraska….looking forward to it.

   The ‘strategy’ was the FAITH program….starting with the F for forgiveness….very man centered starting with availability of forgiveness apart from any knowledge of sin or the divine character that demands justice.

   I saw a stat that 90% of the SBC was Arminian, Dever would have a bit of a problem getting elected with that constituency.

   erik
5. Barry says:

   November 12, 2006 at 1:19 am

   Ah FAITH. I remember it well. The other problem I had with it was the cold call approach by disguising the real intent of the visit for a so called survey. Asking generic churchy type questions like “What ministry in the church do think the church needs to focus more on? A) Women’s B) Men’s C) Senior’s D) Children’s. This was done in order to lead into a watered down Gospel presentation. I would sometimes would them how they would define the word sin. This too was met with resistance from other co-leaders.

   I also appreciate the ministry of Ray Comfort and have adopted some of his methods in my personal evangelism, such as using the Ten Commandments to direct the individual to understand their condition and standing before God. Understanding that it is the power of the Gospel of Christ that saves people from their sins. If it is watered down with a “friendly” version that does not discuss man’s emity toward God can it ever be a complete Gospel. I don’t believe there is such a thing as a partial Gospel.

   Fight the good fight and preach a complete Gospel for God does the saving. I thank God that he has allowed us to participate in His sovereign plan to His glory.
6. Bill Poore says:

   December 21, 2006 at 4:43 pm

   Ray Comfort does an excellent job on confronting sin,but weak on justification by faith.
7. erik says:

   December 22, 2006 at 10:03 am

   Bill I agree with you. I love Comfort’s boldness, zeal, and desire to confront sin. However, in listening to Hells Best Kept Secret I don’t remember coming away impressed with my need to make justification clear (the term is not necessary but the theological truth is).

   thanks for the comment.
8. centuri0n (F. Turk) says:

   December 28, 2006 at 2:33 pm

   Dude:

   I just wanted to give you a “booyah” for this post.
9. erik says:

   December 29, 2006 at 10:13 am

   Thanks man. I hear those are hard to come by :/

   Thanks for coming by.
10. Donny Pauling says:

    March 18, 2007 at 4:40 pm

    Perhaps I’m reading what you’ve written a bit incorrectly, but from what I’ve read I think it might be possible you aren’t fully comprehending “sin”. The laws of the Bible are based on love, not wrath and judgment. Let me elaborate with an example.

    The Bible talks about abstaining from sex until married. The point is NOT that you will be damned if you have sex with someone to whom you’re not married. The point is that God loves all of us more than we can fathom, and he wants the very best life for us.

    I have a 7 year old son. He loves candy. He can’t comprehend why I don’t just let him eat all he wants to eat. Someday he’ll be mature enough to do so. He’ll see that my “law” was made out of love and concern for his well being.

    Back to premarital sex: one reason God asks us to wait is so that when we finally ARE married we won’t be carrying around the baggage of our feelings for another person, or memories of acts we performed with someone else. Wouldn’t it be so much more romantic if the only person on the mind of a married individual is his/her spouse? THAT is what God wants. He wants the BEST for his kids.

    Every law he asks us to follow is written out of love. The “wrath” mentioned in the Bible is simply an emotion closely related to anguish and extreme sadness. God so desperately wants us to avoid hurting ourself. That’s why he gives us rules: to show us the best way to live our life. As with my son, we’ll understand his laws much more as we mature and draw closer to him.

    I think many modern churches “get” this concept. It’s not necessary to focus on sin if we are focused on love, because as we fall in love more with God we’ll naturally want to obey him and please him, just as a couple who fall in love want to do what’s best for each other. If you know your wife doesn’t like you to smoke, and you truly love her, you’ll want to stop just because you know she dislikes that particular habit. Likewise, if we focus on loving Jesus Christ with all of our hearts we’ll start following his “laws” out of love and respect, rather than fear of “wrath”. Yes, it’s okay to mention sin from time to time, but it’s just SO MUCH more effective to work on getting to know God so that a deep love is formed.

    Fear never changes hearts. Legislation never changes hearts. Only love changes hearts.